✦ Educational Innovator & Creator

I craft engaging mathematical journeys and creative learning spaces, students love.

A dedicated and disciplined Mathematics educator at Sainik School Nalanda, recognized as a Gemini Certified Educator and Google AI Certified Educator. Dedicated to transforming abstract math into joyful learning through interactive digital tools, NEP‑aligned resources, and creative publications.

Akash Srivastva Teaching Illustration

Certificate

Issued by Google for Education

Google Certificate
✦ My Process

From idea to impact.

A structured, student‑centered process I follow to turn a classroom gap into a working digital resource.

🔍

1. Explore

Identifying student learning gaps and where a concept needs more clarity.

✎

2. Formulate

Crafting digital TLMs and NEP‑aligned worksheets around that gap.

▶

3. Execute

Implementing interactive, NEP 2020‑aligned methodologies in the classroom.

✦

4. Inspire

Achieving academic rigor and clarity that students genuinely enjoy.

✦ Let's Create Together

Have an innovative mathematical
project or idea in mind? Let's bring it to life!

✉ Send Me a Message

Quick Questions

What kind of worksheets do you design?+
I design interactive, NEP-aligned digital worksheets tailored for conceptual clarity, self-paced practice, and immediate feedback.
Can you build TLMs for my chapter?+
Yes! I specialize in creating digital Teaching-Learning Models (TLMs) and virtual visual tools.
How do you integrate technology into math?+
I leverage ICT tools, interactive Live Worksheets, dynamic geometric models, and activity-based learning aligned with NEP 2020.
Can educators reach out to discuss ideas?+
Absolutely! I am always happy to connect, share insights, and discuss innovative math pedagogy with fellow educators.
← Back to Class List
✦ NCF 2023 ALIGNED • VISUAL LEARNING SERIES ✦

Chapter 1: Real Numbers

Exploring the building blocks of mathematics: Prime Factorisation & Irrationals.

Curated by Akash Srivastva
The set of Real Numbers consists of all rational numbers (of the form p/q where p, q are integers and q ≠ 0) and all irrational numbers. In this chapter we study the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and use it to prove the irrationality of √2, √3, √5 and to understand the nature of HCF, LCM and decimal expansions.
Click the core node to explore the mind map
01 Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
▼
Theorem 1.1

Every composite number can be expressed (factorised) as a product of primes, and this factorisation is unique, apart from the order in which the prime factors occur.

Detailed Example (from NCERT):
32760 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 5 × 7 × 13
= 2³ × 3² × 5 × 7 × 13
Important Application:
Can 4ⁿ end with the digit 0 for any natural number n?
No. Because 4ⁿ = (2²)ⁿ = 2²ⁿ. The only prime factor is 2. For a number to end with 0 it must be divisible by both 2 and 5. By uniqueness, the prime 5 can never appear.
02 Proofs of Irrationality
▼
Theorems 1.2 & 1.3

Theorem 1.2: Let p be a prime number. If p divides a², then p divides a, where a is a positive integer.

Complete Proof that √2 is irrational:
1. Assume √2 = a/b (co-prime).
2. 2b² = a² → 2 divides a² → 2 divides a.
3. a = 2c → b² = 2c² → 2 divides b.
4. Common factor 2 → contradiction.
5. Hence √2 is irrational.
Same method proves √3, √5 and √p (p prime) are irrational. Also: 5−√3, 3√2, 1/√2, 7√5, 6+√2 are irrational.
03 HCF & LCM Applications
▼
Prime Factorisation Method

HCF = Product of the smallest power of each common prime factor.
LCM = Product of the greatest power of every prime factor involved.

Example: 6 = 2¹×3¹  |  20 = 2²×5¹
HCF = 2   LCM = 60
HCF(a,b) × LCM(a,b) = a × b
Note: This relation holds only for two numbers. For three or more numbers it does not hold in general.
04 Rational & Irrational Properties
▼
Arithmetic Combinations
Example 1: 5 − √3 is irrational
Assume it is rational → √3 becomes rational → contradiction.
Example 2: 3√2 is irrational
Assume it is rational → √2 becomes rational → contradiction.
Rules:
• Rational ± Irrational = Irrational
• Non-zero Rational × Irrational = Irrational
• Rational ÷ Irrational = Irrational